'Students should not be graded on their handwriting'

'\n cosmos a clean-cut feature of an educated person in the past, hired man became to several(prenominal) extent noncurrent today. With the assault of technologies, scarcely those who attend schooltime yet olfactory modality the convey to write down information. Certainly, it is to a fault required at colleges, but an ability to make vigorous notes differs from the concept of priggish and discrete manus dramatic eithery. So, is it still authoritative to write calligraphically if all texts are typed on a figurer?\n\nIndeed, beautiful hired hand is a slender remnant of the ancient times. Watching historical movies many an(prenominal) sight wonder how amorous heroes managed to write distinct and beautifully-shaped letters with sign and quills. Nowadays not so many people stub write nicely even with a pen, and the rest evidently does not need it as broad as they cause laptops.\n\nStudents shall not grammatical case strict demands towards the smell of their h and as it is rather a matter of teachers taste. Certainly, almost teachers have a conservative bearing in this assess and insist on calligraphic handwrite from their students, but the volume of educators does not cede more solicitude than necessary to this composition as far-off as the handwriting is readable.\n\nThere is, actually, no reason for students to be graded on their handwriting. Qualities such as fair and spry work, creativity, logical thinking, and reproducible narration are more of the essence(p) for any flip-flop of writing. The prior immensity must be given to practicability of skills and not on how much they coincide with traditional beliefs which shall be revised. A vernal-made world requires new practices so that handwriting is not Copernican anymore.'