Safeco

Ancient papistic type culture looked at gladiators, exotic puppets, and comedic contests as body- get on of diversion; a lot as people in troupe today contrive follow trading floorb only for am social functionment. To meet the conduct for entertainment dickens(prenominal) the Colosseum and SAFECO subject field were take a leaked as platforms for athletes and others to dazzle the poised crowds. Both coordinates allowed big(a) plurality of people to conjugate in right ara and behold the festivities that brought them to the edge of their seats. The technology advancements in ii(prenominal) geological eras throw away created an environment for all to gather. To compel the masses both stadiums were constructed in an elliptical shape which created different aims enabling e genuinely whizz to see the events pickings sit at an emphases bea in the concentrate on. To post the weight of numerous people both figings uses columns and arches as archi tectural tools as wholesome patterns for design. The very homogeneous ideas of arches and columns that were demo on the Colosseum, cautioned in the germinal activity of the retract fit chapiter seen on SAFECO stadium. In fact, the roof of SAFECO topic is a large arched complex body part supported by gigantic slue columns (Howard, 2000). Today, being open to be forward of our cartridge holders is number from the classical age. and so allowing us to proceed in the foot of new and disagreeent ideas. tarnish both the Colosseum and Seattles SAFECO demesne were constructed for entertainment purposes and were con billetred marvels for their era, by analyzing their structure, office of locution, and sizing it becomes app arent the divergencys in the deuce stadiums.         During the rule of the papistic imperium, the Colosseum was looked upon as a superb structure that befuddled the mind and inspired the imagination. People would move fr om cities farther from the roman capitol u! pright to marvel at the size and technology the Colosseum displayed. The woods instrumenten floor where all the performances took place; possess mevery supply and doors that retracted to reveal the hind chamber beneath. The complexity and confused designs were far beyond the norm for the era. exclusively these attrisolelyes lead to the Colosseum gaining its fabled status. age technology has undoubtedly evolved from the era of the Roman Empire to now, Seattles SAFECO subject possesses much of the same status in our society as the Colosseum did in its date. Everything from the 655 alkali retractile roof to the jumbo screen which uses the roofs steel beams for support, dazzles any baseball fan. Fans come from all oer to look at this stupefying piece of artwork as they did the Roman Colosseum.          though the passageway to get to your seat may cause been different it is informal to see how the seating room was alike. The Colosseum had covered ba lconies go with by servants much like the luxury boxes of SAFECO celestial sphere. Women and poorer respective(prenominal)s stood or sit down on wooden bleachers on the fourth level of the Colosseum. In view for them to get to their seats they had to climb steep, sloping ramps. forthwith seats are more than than comfortable and come with section rests. In order to get to these seats one would have to solely use the cover stairway. But architectures today copied those of the Roman era. They both built each seat to allow the decorous display level in front of them. Although the way to ones seat was slightly more convenient the architectural wake level is the same.         From the perspective of an architect, the blueprints for both buildings call for the use of cream of tartar to be built properly. Without the correct mathematics the buildings may have ended up lop berthd or weak. In fact, it was in the Roman era that much of the math that i s apply to construct buildings ways documented and i! mplemented into architecture. The Romans so ahead of their prison term were able to put four tiers together. Knowing the complications of that they were able to build all for at a perfect incline. development hundreds of archways and columns for support. The out-of-door of the building was do with marble and concrete forming a peculiar support. The builders of today that constructed SAFECO study applied the same numerical techniques as the Romans. They too had to incline their 3 tier seating, but they went a step ahead. They had to perfectly place the lighting outline which was made of stainless steel; to perfectly fit when the 22 one thousand thousand pounds of steel and fiber glass cognise as the retractable roof closes (Smith, 2000). As a result of these numerical principles both buildings posses angular measurements equal to the area of circles, rectangles, and all types of triangles. though the two buildings have an enormous gap in conviction betwixt their c onstructions, the same mathematical formulas and postulates were used to insure the potentiality and congruousness of the structures. A utmost drumhead of comparison is in the unfeigned break in which the two stadiums were constructed. Both stadiums began with recondite foundations that had to be created to combat the weak restency of the soil in which the stadiums were built. Because both stadiums were constructed in basin areas close to sea level the soil was very loose and the foundations had to be deep nice to reach the condensed rock and roll below. In SAFECO Field they put 1,400 pilings 90 feet below the stain to accommodate the oatmeal type soil. subsequently the foundations were established, the use of arches and columns were implemented to create the frequent shape and support for the buildings. To conclude the process the detailed seating and outward designs were created.         While the purpose, status, seating, and general construction may have been extravagantlyly similar, at that plac! e exists umpteen incompatible elements as well. The actual material that the stadiums consist of is very different. The Colosseum was constructed of primarily of an early form of concrete and wood; while SAFECO Field consist of manly of concrete, steal ,synthetic medals, and fiberglass. From an architectural stand pull down, the mainstay of the Colosseum rests in the arches and columns. On the contrary, columns and arches simply aid the welded steal rods, simple wheels, and pulleys used to create SAFECO Field. The computers, motors, and other electronic components used to operate the field are other, more obvious, differences.          on similar lines, the means of construction and get along of time essential for construction differs amid the two stadiums. The Colosseum was constructed by the use of break ones back and animal prod.

Wooden ramps and pulleys hoisted the equipment needed to mold the concrete into the structure of the Colosseum today. This sound process took 10 years to complete. In comparison, SAFECO Field was constructed in only 27 ½ months. High tech machinery and cranes took the place of the massive abundance of human labor needed to build the Colosseum. What makes the arrive of time taken to build the stadiums even more terrible are the relative sizes. The Colosseum stood roughly 160 feet high; when compared to just the 655 foot roof on SAFECO Field. Surprisingly however, the Colossseum holds most 5,000 more people than the capacity of SAFECO Field. Obviously the decorations and special features of the Colosseum are far less than the 56X 60 scoreboard and 9 elevators of SAFECO Fiel! d. Though the time span and the material were very different the final product produced was magnificent.         A blatantly obvious difference in the structure of both buildings is the shape in which they are made. While they both use the ecliptic model for what is now known as stadium seating the Colosseum was built as cylinder, and SAFECO Field was constructed in the form of a rectangular prism. Because the Colosseum is cylindrical the dimensions from the sum nitty-gritty are all the same no theme what side the point of view is coming from. With these configurations the only aspect that affects the point of view is the level or height. In the case of SAFECO Field more than just the height affects the point of view. Because the seating is do in more of a triangular manner, the distance from the amount of money focal point to the actual point of view stooge vary depending on the exact location along the triangle. For example, whether an individual is seat ed in the left, right, front, or back of the Colosseum doesnt matter as long as the heights are equivalent. At SAFECO Field, an individual seated in the center of outfield or base of the triangle has a short distance to a center vocal point than an individual seated at one of the triangles points. Because of this same principle the volumes of the two buildings would differ even if the dimensions are somewhat similar. After analyzing the purpose, seating aspects, general process of construction, and the mathematical principles used to build both the Colosseum and SAFECO Field it appears that the two structures are very similar. However when taking into friendship the means by which both builds were created it becomes noticeable that the two buildings parting contrasting elements produced by the large amount of time that passed between the building of the two stadiums. In addition, the length of time needed to build each structure, shape, seating capacity, and technology all app rove as contrasting components. While both stadiums ! were, and in many ways still are marvels of their era, time has transcended many of the aspects of the creation of such structures. Through time slave labor has been replaced by machines, and limestone concrete constructions have given way to elegant concrete and steel stadiums. If you want to get a proficient essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper