Adult moral reasoning

For an dexterous Fowlers framework could be the next big thing in terms of serious theoretical positions on the formation of virtuousity and moral reasoning and the substance of faith. In a human vista, Fowler successfully try to provide a picture that illustrates and guides both the individual being canvas and the observer/scientist via the stages (Berger, 1994).Though these stages atomic number 18 not as explicitly applicable to every persons, like other psychologists such as Erikson and Maslow, Fowlers important ploughshare apparently is more than expansion of Kohlberg or Piaget. His own personal journey, drawn-out and in-depth research has given him a solid premise to work on (Berger, 1994).My personal journey whitethorn probably be described well-nigh in the perspective which is described by Fowler. I get intot have more than experience and enough intellectual prowess and cognizance to be in the position to do a thorough recapitulation on the theory and theorist.How ever, since it is a personal response paper, there is nonpareil segment that I can truly say that speaks a covey about who I am and my own journey. For instance, faith and godliness are intricately intertwined just as faith, ethics and values are some synonymous (Berger, 1994).Fowler may be correct to a certain out go up in attributing specific concepts which indeed are descriptive of universal experiences (Berger, 1994), and I cannot argue with this theorist on this issue. It is altogether important to me that individuals must come to grips to the effects of personal faith on conduct and decision make process, and such issues as personal priorities.It is when a person decides to commit to what may be attributed as a mystical Being (i.e., in the excogitation of God) that spells a difference to that persons worldview or way of life. I would still like to argue with Fowler that he has reduced so much to an intellectual explanation something which cannot be explained since there is a difference (in my perspective and understanding) between mere knowledge of God and real spirituality.I personally dont like it when intellectuals and philosophers settle to study God or morality and departing from real substantive and life changing faith.ReferenceBerger, K. S. (1994). The developing person through the life-span. (3rd ed). Worth.